Filed
9/9/10
>CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
>
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AMZ INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., Defendant, Cross‑defendant and Respondent; PACIFIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants, Cross‑complainants and Appellants. | G041188 (Super. Ct. No. 06CC08942) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment
and postjudgment orders of the Superior
Court of Orange
County, Kirk H. Nakamura, Judge. Affirmed.
Wesierski & Zurek,
Thomas W. Ely, Laura J. Barns and John E. Stobart for Defendants, Cross‑complainants
and Appellants.
Gilbert, Kelly, Crowley
& Jennett, Timothy Kenna, Craig H. Bell and Allan E. Perry for
Plaintiff and Respondent.
No appearance for
Defendant, Cross‑defendant and Respondent.
Introduction
A
binder is a contract of insurance that provides coverage pending the issuance
of the insurance policy. ( >Adams v. Explorer Ins. Co. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 438, 451 ( >Adams).) The central issue in this case is whether a
document entitled â€