legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bradford

P. v. Bradford
02:20:2010



P. v. Bradford



Filed 2/16/10 P. v. Bradford CA3



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT



(Sacramento)



----



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



MARQUEES ANDREAUS BRADFORD,



Defendant and Appellant.



C063091



(Super. Ct. No. 08F03934)



Defendant Marquees Andreaus Bradford pled no contest to conspiracy to commit first degree robbery, and admitted a strike, in exchange for a stipulated sentence of eight years and the dismissal of other charges and the dismissal of a separate case.



The factual basis for the plea showed that on or about May 16, 2008, defendant conspired to commit first degree robbery of a person near an ATM machine, and personally possessed a firearm which he pointed at the victim. Defendants strike was a 2006 delinquency adjudication for robbery.[1]



The trial court sentenced defendant to eight years in prison, and dismissed the other charges and the other case, as called for by the plea bargain. Defendant timely filed his notice of appeal.



Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.



DISPOSITION



The judgment is affirmed.



ROBIE , J.



We concur:



NICHOLSON , Acting P. J.



BUTZ , J.



Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.



Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Property line attorney.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com







[1] A codefendant, Dominic Gipson, also pled and received a five-year term, but he is not a party to this appeal.





Description Defendant Marquees Andreaus Bradford pled no contest to conspiracy to commit first degree robbery, and admitted a strike, in exchange for a stipulated sentence of eight years and the dismissal of other charges and the dismissal of a separate case.
The factual basis for the plea showed that on or about May 16, 2008, defendant conspired to commit first degree robbery of a person near an ATM machine, and personally possessed a firearm which he pointed at the victim. Defendants strike was a 2006 delinquency adjudication for robbery.
The trial court sentenced defendant to eight years in prison, and dismissed the other charges and the other case, as called for by the plea bargain. Defendant timely filed his notice of appeal.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale