In re R.B.
Filed 6/5/06 In re R.B. CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(San Joaquin)
----
| In re R.B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. R. B., Defendant and Appellant. |
C050618
(Super. Ct. No. J60430)
|
Following a contested jurisdiction hearing, minor Rakim B. was found to be within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 in that he committed a lewd act with a child under the age of 14. He was continued as a ward of the court, ordered to serve a period of confinement in juvenile hall, but was released to the custody of his guardian on various conditions, including electronic monitoring. Over his objection, he was ordered to submit to warrantless searches of his person, personal effects, place of residence or temporary abode, areas under his control, and vehicles registered to or driven by him.
On appeal, the minor contends the search condition must be stricken because it had no relationship to the charged offense or his social history. We shall affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In August 2000, the minor and his brother each attempted to steal shoes from a sporting goods store. The minors were cited and released.
In July 2001, the minor pried open a window and entered a school. He took property that was later recovered. The minor was lectured and released to his mother.
In July 2003, an original petition was filed in San Joaquin County Juvenile Court. As ultimately amended, the petition alleged that the then-15-year-old minor had trespassed in a vacant home and had obstructed an officer. The minor admitted both allegations. He was adjudged a ward of the court, committed to the juvenile justice center for five days with one day of credit, and thereafter released to the custody of his mother under rules of probation.
In December 2003, a subsequent petition was filed alleging that the minor committed indecent exposure. The petition gave notice of aggregation of terms. Following a contested hearing, the allegation was found true. The minor was continued as a ward, committed to juvenile hall for 60 days, which was suspended on the condition that he enroll in and complete a counseling program, and released to the custody of his mother.
In March 2004, the minor underwent a psychological evaluation by Roger Katz, Ph.D. Dr. Katz reported that the minor â€
