P. v. Tellez
Filed 12/3/08 P. v. Tellez CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARLOS ALBERTO TELLEZ, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B207501 (Super. Ct. No. VA095690-01) (Los Angeles County) |
Carlos Alberto Tellez appeals an order revoking his probation and sentencing him to three years of imprisonment.
On January 12, 2007, Tellez received advice of and waived his constitutional rights, and pleaded nolo contendere to the making of criminal threats. (Pen. Code, 422.) The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and granted Tellez five years of formal probation, with terms and conditions that included treatment in a residential rehabilitation program.
On May 4, 2007, the trial court found Tellez in violation of probation. The trial court reinstated probation with an additional condition of residential treatment at a different facility. On February 26, 2008, Tellez admitted a second violation of probation. The trial court imposed an upper-term sentence of three years of imprisonment, imposed fines, and awarded Tellez 710 days of presentence custody credits. Tellez requested a certificate of probable cause to challenge his nolo contendere plea. The trial court denied the certificate.
We appointed counsel to represent Tellez in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, she filed an opening brief raising no issues.
On September 2, 2008, we advised Tellez that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Tellez's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
GILBERT, P.J.
We concur:
YEGAN, J.
PERREN, J.
Beverly Reid O'Connelly, Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
______________________________
Kathleen M. Redmond, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line attorney.
