P. v. Ly
Filed 10/22/08 P. v. Ly CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
‑‑‑‑
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HUNG THIEU LY et al., Defendants and Appellants. | C052280 (Super. Ct. No. 04F00144) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITIONS FOR REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] |
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed in this case on September 23, 2008, be modified as follows:
1. At page 19 of the opinion, delete the second full paragraph, which begins Defendants are precluded from raising this argument.
2. Also at page 19 of the opinion, delete the following from the beginning of the third full paragraph: In any event, so the first sentence of the paragraph reads: Woods does not support defendants assertion that the trial court was obligated to give the augmentation.
There is no change in the judgment.
The petitions for rehearing of codefendants Nicole Carroll, John Dich, Chan Vehn (John) Lam, and, by joinder, Jimmy Chi Cooc are denied.
BY THE COURT:
SCOTLAND , P. J.
HULL, J.
BUTZ , J.
Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by San Diego County Property line attorney.
