P. v. Lerma
Filed 5/7/08 P. v. Lerma CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHNNY LERMA, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B202638 (Super. Ct. No. 2006003675) (Super. Ct. No. 2006042832) (Ventura County) |
Johnny Lerma appeals from judgments entered in two cases after the trial court denied his motions to suppress evidence and appellant entered a change of plea. In case number 2006003675, appellant pled guilty to obliterating the serial number on a firearm (Pen. Code 12090)[1]and carrying a loaded firearm in a vehicle ( 12031, subd. (a)(1)), and admitted that the offenses were committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang ( 186.22, subd. (b)). In case number 2006042832, appellant pled guilty to transportation of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, 11379, subd. (a)) and possession of a deadly weapon ( 12020, subd. (d)), and admitted that he committed the transportation offense while released on bail ( 12022.1, subd. (b)).
The trial court suspended imposition of sentence in case number 2006003675 and granted probation subject to the condition that appellant serve 366 days jail and pay certain fines and fees. In case number 2006042832, the trial court suspended imposition of sentence and granted probation subject to the condition that appellant serve 180 days jail and pay certain fines and fees.
We appointed counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On March 25, 2008, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. We have received no response from appellant.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 125-126.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN, J.
We concur:
GILBERT, P.J.
PERREN, J.
Kevin McGee, Judge
Superior Court County of Ventura
______________________________
California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard B. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Respondent.
Publication Courtesy of California lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Escondido Property line Lawyers.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com
[1]All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated.
