P. v. Gallegos
Filed 7/2//08 P. v. Gallegos CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FRANCISCO JAVIER GALLEGOS, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B199933 (Super. Ct. No. NA072665) (Los Angeles County) |
Francisco Javier Gallegos appeals the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of shooting at an occupied vehicle (Pen. Code,[1] 246) and on four counts of assault with a firearm ( 245, subd. (a)(2)). The jury also found true allegations that Gallegos had personally used a firearm in committing the assaults ( 12022.5, subd. (a)). He was sentenced to a total term of 14 years state prison.
On December 10, 2007, Gallegos fired shots at a vehicle occupied by Orlando Salas, Carmen Hernandez, and Patricia and Juan Castaneda. Gallegos and his passenger (codefendant Henry Montoya) were apprehended shortly thereafter as Gallegos was driving the truck from which the shots had been fired. Testimony at trial indicated there had been prior incidents between the victims' family and Gallegos' family regarding parking on the street where they lived.
We appointed counsel to represent Gallegos in this appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and requesting this court to independently examine the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.
On February 14, 2008, we advised Gallegos that he had 30 days in which to submit a written brief or letter stating any contentions or arguments he wished us to consider. We have received no response from him.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellate counsel has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at pp. 441-442.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
PERREN, J.
We concur:
YEGAN, Acting P.J.
COFFEE, J.
Arthur Jean, Jr., Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
______________________________
Debra Fischl, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line attorney.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com
