In re D.T
Filed 5/5/06 In re D.T. CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| In re D.T., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B185156 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CK51557) |
| LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BRUCE T., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
Steven Berman, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Conditionally reversed.
Michael A. Salazar, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, Arezoo Pichvai, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
___________________________________________________
This appeal is from a restraining order issued by the juvenile court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 213.5, subd. (a)) against appellant, Bruce T., following a dependency petition (§ 300) and the termination of appellant's parental rights as to his son, D.T. (born July 2001).[1] The restraining order was prompted by appellant's annoying and molesting conduct toward his son and his son's maternal grandmother and caretaker, Edwina L. Contrary to appellant's contention, he was not a â€
