P. v. Kirkland
Filed 1/9/08 P. v. Kirkland CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID JAMES KIRKLAND, Defendant and Appellant. | C052867 (Super. Ct. No. 05F01998) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] |
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 26, 2007, be modified as follows:
On page 6 of the opinion, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph, the word consecutive is changed to concurrent so the sentence reads:
Since the sentence for leaving the scene was concurrent to the principal term, resentencing is not necessary.
There is no change in the judgment.
BY THE COURT:
DAVIS, Acting P.J.
ROBIE , J.
BUTZ , J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line attorney.
