legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Lake Berryessa Enterprises v. Petty

Lake Berryessa Enterprises v. Petty
12:15:2007



Lake Berryessa Enterprises v. Petty



Filed 9/19/07 Lake Berryessa Enterprises v. Petty CA1/3



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION THREE



LAKE BERRYESSA ENTERPRISES, INC., II,



Plaintiff, Cross-defendant



and Respondent,



v.



ROBERT W. PETTY et al.,



Defendants, Cross-complainants



and Appellants.



A112128



(Napa County Super.



Ct. No. 26-17758)



Robert W. Petty, Lynne I. Petty, and Leisa Petty (the Pettys) appeal a postjudgment order awarding contractual attorney fees to Lake Berryessa Enterprises, Inc., II (LBE) as prevailing parties, following a 17-day court trial. The Pettys and LBE agree that resolution of this appeal depends on the outcome of the related appeal of the judgment entered in favor of LBE in the underlying action. Because we today affirmed the underlying judgment in A111217, we affirm the attorney fees order contested in this appeal.




DISPOSITION



The trial courts order is affirmed.



_________________________



Siggins, J.



We concur:



_________________________



McGuiness, P.J.



_________________________



Pollak, J.



Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.



Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line Lawyers.





Description Robert W. Petty, Lynne I. Petty, and Leisa Petty (the Pettys) appeal a postjudgment order awarding contractual attorney fees to Lake Berryessa Enterprises, Inc., II (LBE) as prevailing parties, following a 17-day court trial. The Pettys and LBE agree that resolution of this appeal depends on the outcome of the related appeal of the judgment entered in favor of LBE in the underlying action. Because we today affirmed the underlying judgment in A111217, Court affirm the attorney fees order contested in this appeal.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale