legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Shemian v. Afshani

Shemian v. Afshani
09:30:2007

Shemian v. Afshani



Filed 9/14/06 Shemian v. Afshani CA2/3







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION THREE










MORRIS SHEMIAN et al.,


Plaintifffs and Respondents,


v.


SHAHRAM AFSHANI and CDMA CALIFORNIA PARTNERS,


Defendants and Appellants.



B181185


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. SC070925)



APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Allan J. Goodman, Judge. Affirmed.


McDougal and Associates, Donald C. McDougal, Jr. and Norman Paul Breen for Defendants and Appellants.


Zakariaie & Zakariaie, Jack M. Zakariaie and Nilou A. Zakariaie for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


INTRODUCTION


The trial court entered judgment upon the grant of summary judgment (and later awarded attorney fees) in favor of defendants and appellants Shahram Afshani and CDMA California Partners, LLC (collectively â€





Description Defendants appeal the order vacating the judgment and the order denying the motion for reconsideration. Court affirm both orders. The trial court did not abuse its discretion.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale