CA Unpub Decisions

Defendant entered guilty pleas to eight counts of robbery. Defendant admitted personal firearm use during one of the robberies and serving five prior prison terms. The court denied a motion to substitute counsel and a motion to withdraw the guilty pleas. Hence this appeal.

A criminal law decision regarding throwing a substance at a vehicle and its occupant with intent to do great bodily injury and assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury.

A criminal law decision regarding possession of a forged check and making or passing a forged check.

A criminal law decision regarding failure to register as a sex offender.

A decision regarding "solicitation billing" and "cramming" in violation of the Civil Code, breach of contract, Insurance Code, unjust enrichment, the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition, and false advertising.

This is an appeal prosecuted by various persons (the Artists) taken after an order denying various claims. But it appears to be an attempt to avoid the effects of another judgment that the appellant take nothing by its complaint against the respondant and that the respondant be awarded fee simple, quiet title to the real property located at 1565 Vendola Drive, San Rafael, California. Court has found nothing of merit in the appeal.

Appellant appeals the drug and alcohol testing probation condition imposed after appellant pled nolo contendere pursuant to a plea bargain to failing to register annually as a sex offender and failing to notify law enforcement in writing of change of residence address. Appellant contends the probation condition must be stricken because it was not reasonably related to Appellant's offense and there was no evidence that appellant had a substance abuse problem.

A minor appeals from an order of the juvenile court continuing him as a ward of the court and returning appellant to the custody of the California Youth Authority (CYA). Appellate counsel asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine if it discloses the presence of any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Court have concluded that review and, finding neither error nor arguable issues, affirm.

This is a dispute between two sisters over ownership and possession of a condominium (the property) once owned by their deceased parents, as well as the proceeds from the sale of their father's apartment building and money in a trust fund.

Appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted defendant of two counts of robbery and one count of carjacking. Court modified the judgment to reflect the imposition of a 10-year firearm-use enhancement under Penal Code section 12022.53, subdivision (b), on count 2 for carjacking and count 3 for robbery. The imposition of two five-year enhancements under section 667, subdivision (a)(1), on each of the three counts on which Defendant was convicted and an award of 1,371 days of actual custody credit. As modified, Court affirm the judgment.

Appeal from the trial court's declaratory judgment that the completed operations provision of their insurance policy from defendant does not cover their condominium project. Court affirm.

Appeal from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained, without leave to amend, a demurrer to Appellant's complaint for breach of employment contract and related torts against her former employer, the Service Employees International Union Local 347 (the union) and its principals Julie Butcher.

Petitioner, a fifth grader in the Palmdale School District, made a sexually harassing statement about a female classmate, and the Defendants suspended him from school for three days. Through his mother and guardian ad litem, Plaintiff filed a petition for writ of mandate against the Defendants, seeking to expunge the suspension from his school records. The trial court denied the petition. Petitioner appeals, and court affirm.

A decision regarding sexual abuse against step daughter at the time she was 14 and 15 years old, and causing corporal injury to spouse, forcible sexual penetration, sexual penetration with a person under the age of 16, forcible oral copulation, oral copulation of a person under the age of 16, rape, unlawful sexual intercourse and battery against a spouse. Defendant was sentenced to 40 years in state prison, with credit of 361 days, consisting of 314 days credit for time served and 47 days of conduct credit.