Fear Not Law Unpublished Published

CA Pub. Decisions

California Supreme Court and Court of Appeal published (citable) opinions.
2,656 opinions · page 35 of 100 · 20 per page
  1. PEOPLE v. WOODS
    Dec 31, 2010
    Defendant, Vincent Woods, appeals from his convictions for cocaine possession (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)) and misdemeanor marijuana possession. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (b).) In the published portion of this opinion, we address the issue of whether, when…
  2. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC v. SUPERIOR COURT OF
    Dec 31, 2010
    In the underlying action, real parties in interest sought to recover civil penalties from petitioner Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Home Depot) under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 ((PAGA); Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.).[1] The trial court overruled Home Depot's…
  3. BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC v. CASSIDY
    Dec 31, 2010
    Appellants appeal from a judgment based on, inter alia, a determination that they were judicially estopped from denying that they are bound by a settlement agreement. We hold that even if the settlement agreement had not been binding, appellants were judicially estopped from deny…
  4. In re V.M.,
    Dec 31, 2010
    The trial court was not justified in asserting dependency jurisdiction over the child in this case, who had never been abused or neglected by anyone. The child, V.M., came to the attention of the Department of Children and Family Services after her father asserted his right to cu…
  5. PEOPLE v. NESBITT Part-II
    Dec 31, 2010
    This case is closer to the recent decision in Jackson v. Superior Court (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1051 (Jackson). In that case, the defendant was sentenced following judgments of conviction on two felony counts. (Id. p. 1056.) The defendant thereafter filed a petition for a writ of …
  6. PEOPLE v. NESBITT Part-I
    Dec 31, 2010
    Defendant and appellant Michael Nesbitt (defendant) was convicted on six felony counts based upon the sexual abuse of three of his children.[1] On appeal, defendant contends, inter alia, that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to vacate an order entered in the minutes dismissing…
  7. PARTNERS v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Part-II
    Dec 30, 2010
    The Mello-Roos Act itself also supports the conclusion that payment of proceeds from Mello-Roos bonds by the CFD constitutes a payment of money by a political subdivision of the state to a developer. The Act is â€
  8. PARTNERS v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
    Dec 30, 2010
    Azusa Land Partners (ALP) appeals from a judgment denying its petition for writ of mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085.) ALP seeks to vacate a determination by respondent Department of Industrial Relations (Department) that a planned community project is a â€
  9. SCHUMAN v. IGNATIN
    Dec 30, 2010
    This case involves a dispute among property owners in a general plan development of 68 homes in Los Angeles. The owners of one of the properties, Allan Ignatin and Janet Sobell (collectively, Ignatin),[1] want to build a house that other property owners believe would violate reco…
  10. CITY OF SANTA ROSA v. PATEL
    Dec 30, 2010
    These appeals, consolidated on this court's motion, follow the trial court's entry of an order awarding the City of Santa Rosa and the People of the State of California (collectively, the City) attorney fees in this red light abatement action. In appeal No. A124199, the C…
  11. CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Part-I
    Sep 27, 2010
    Charter schools are public schools that operate independently from, but with oversight by, the school districts or county boards of education that approve their charters. Before 2002, charter schools operated without geographic restrictions; a school chartered in Los Angeles coul…
  12. CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Part-II
    Sep 27, 2010
    Charter schools are public schools that operate independently from, but with oversight by, the school districts or county boards of education that approve their charters. Before 2002, charter schools operated without geographic restrictions; a school chartered in Los Angeles coul…
  13. CELLPHONE FEE TERMINATION Part-I
    Sep 27, 2010
    This is a consolidated appeal in one of several coordinated class actions that challenge wireless telephone carriers' imposition of early termination fees (ETF's) on customers seeking to cancel cellular telephone contracts. The defendant/respondent in this proceeding is C…
  14. CELLPHONE FEE TERMINATION Part-II
    Sep 27, 2010
    This is a consolidated appeal in one of several coordinated class actions that challenge wireless telephone carriers' imposition of early termination fees (ETF's) on customers seeking to cancel cellular telephone contracts. The defendant/respondent in this proceeding is C…
  15. TUCKER v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
    Sep 27, 2010
    In this proposed class action, plaintiffs allege defendant cell phone providers, Pacific Bell Mobile Services and Cingular Wireless LLC (collectively defendants) violated the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof., § 17200 et seq.) by selling â€
  16. In re D.G
    Sep 27, 2010
    Appellant D.G., a ward of the court, was placed on juvenile probation after he and another person were seen burglarizing a home. Neither appellant's current burglary nor his past offenses were committed near a school or involved classmates or other juveniles. Yet in imposing …
  17. BOWMAN v. WYATT
    Sep 27, 2010
    A modification decision.
  18. PEOPLE v. WONG
    Sep 27, 2010
    The story of Leland Wong (Wong) is one of graft and hubris. Wrongly believing he could get away with lying, cheating and stealing, he ended up convicted of multiple crimes, including embezzling money (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a)),[1] accepting a bribe <br /> (§ 68); actin…
  19. BOOKOUT v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    Sep 27, 2010
    Plaintiff brought this action against a number of public entities and a railroad claiming the defendants caused his property to flood when it rained. The complaint alleged inverse condemnation and tort causes of action. The inverse condemnation cause of action was tried to the co…
  20. In re the Marriage of XIA GUO and XIAO HUA SUN.
    Sep 27, 2010
    The superior court entered a judgment nullifying the marriage of appellant Xiao Hua Sun and respondent Xia Guo on the ground that Sun was married to another woman when he purportedly married Guo. The court also denied Sun's claim that he was Guo's putative spouse pursuant…
Prev132333435363738100Next
Lean category · served in 31 ms · full site view