Fear Not Law Unpublished Published

CA Pub. Decisions

California Supreme Court and Court of Appeal published (citable) opinions.
2,656 opinions · page 15 of 100 · 20 per page
  1. ROBERT v. CATHERINE Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    We are called on in this case to decide an issue of first impression in this state; namely, when must a party falsely accused of child abuse or neglect allegations in a child custody proceeding move for sanctions under Family Code[1] section 3027.1 against the person or persons w…
  2. ROBERT v. CATHERINE Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    We are called on in this case to decide an issue of first impression in this state; namely, when must a party falsely accused of child abuse or neglect allegations in a child custody proceeding move for sanctions under Family Code[1] section 3027.1 against the person or persons w…
  3. GREENE v. MARIN COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    A county flood control and water conservation district held an election on whether to impose a new storm drainage fee. The election was mandated by article XIII D of the California Constitution, which was adopted by voter initiative in 1996 as Proposition 218. In the district&#39…
  4. GREENE v. MARIN COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    A county flood control and water conservation district held an election on whether to impose a new storm drainage fee. The election was mandated by article XIII D of the California Constitution, which was adopted by voter initiative in 1996 as Proposition 218. In the district&#39…
  5. GRODENSKY v. CASINO Part-IV
    Dec 11, 2011
    Artichoke Joe's Casino (Artichoke Joe's or the casino) implemented a mandatory tip pooling policy for the dealers. A dealer, Harvey Grodensky, filed a class action and alleged claims for conversion and violating Labor Code sections 351 and 1194. He also claimed in his rep…
  6. GRODENSKY v. CASINO Part-III
    Dec 11, 2011
    Artichoke Joe's Casino (Artichoke Joe's or the casino) implemented a mandatory tip pooling policy for the dealers. A dealer, Harvey Grodensky, filed a class action and alleged claims for conversion and violating Labor Code sections 351 and 1194. He also claimed in his rep…
  7. GRODENSKY v. CASINO Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    Artichoke Joe's Casino (Artichoke Joe's or the casino) implemented a mandatory tip pooling policy for the dealers. A dealer, Harvey Grodensky, filed a class action and alleged claims for conversion and violating Labor Code sections 351 and 1194. He also claimed in his rep…
  8. GRODENSKY v. CASINO Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    Artichoke Joe's Casino (Artichoke Joe's or the casino) implemented a mandatory tip pooling policy for the dealers. A dealer, Harvey Grodensky, filed a class action and alleged claims for conversion and violating Labor Code sections 351 and 1194. He also claimed in his rep…
  9. PEOPLE v. TRI-UNION SEAFOODS, LLC Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    There is no dispute that methylmercury is a reproductive toxin that can harm a developing fetus, and that the primary path for human exposure to methylmercury is consumption of fish. All canned tuna distributed by respondents[1] in California contain traces of methylmercury, yet …
  10. PEOPLE v. TRI-UNION SEAFOODS, LLC Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    There is no dispute that methylmercury is a reproductive toxin that can harm a developing fetus, and that the primary path for human exposure to methylmercury is consumption of fish. All canned tuna distributed by respondents[1] in California contain traces of methylmercury, yet …
  11. PEOPLE v. DEAN Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    Defendant Jeffrey Dean appeals from a judgment and order committing him to the State Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator (SVP).[1] Defendant contends: (1) the trial court erroneously permitted plaintiff's experts to testify to inadmissible hearsay; (2) …
  12. PEOPLE v. DEAN Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    Defendant Jeffrey Dean appeals from a judgment and order committing him to the State Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator (SVP).[1] Defendant contends: (1) the trial court erroneously permitted plaintiff's experts to testify to inadmissible hearsay; (2) …
  13. TROYK v. FARMERS GROUP, INC Part-IV
    Dec 11, 2011
    Plaintiff Thomas E. Troyk filed a class action against defendants Farmers Group, Inc., doing business as Farmers Underwriters Association (FGI), and Farmers Insurance Exchange (FIE) (together Farmers) alleging causes of action for breach of contract and violation of Business and …
  14. TROYK v. FARMERS GROUP, INC Part-III
    Dec 11, 2011
    Plaintiff Thomas E. Troyk filed a class action against defendants Farmers Group, Inc., doing business as Farmers Underwriters Association (FGI), and Farmers Insurance Exchange (FIE) (together Farmers) alleging causes of action for breach of contract and violation of Business and …
  15. TROYK v. FARMERS GROUP, INC Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    Plaintiff Thomas E. Troyk filed a class action against defendants Farmers Group, Inc., doing business as Farmers Underwriters Association (FGI), and Farmers Insurance Exchange (FIE) (together Farmers) alleging causes of action for breach of contract and violation of Business and …
  16. TROYK v. FARMERS GROUP, INC Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    Plaintiff Thomas E. Troyk filed a class action against defendants Farmers Group, Inc., doing business as Farmers Underwriters Association (FGI), and Farmers Insurance Exchange (FIE) (together Farmers) alleging causes of action for breach of contract and violation of Business and …
  17. PEOPLE v.CAMACHO
    Dec 11, 2011
    A verdict form provided to the jury on a charge of robbery mistakenly identified the offense as carjacking. The mistake went unnoticed when the guilty verdict was read and the jury polled, and judgment was imposed as though the jury had returned a verdict of guilty of robbery. Be…
  18. FRANCO v.ATHENS DISPOSAL COMPANY, INC Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    Plaintiff, a trash truck driver, filed this suit, denominated a class action, against his former employer, a private company. He alleged the employer had violated the Labor Code by, among other things, denying meal and rest periods. The employer responded with a petition to compe…
  19. FRANCO v.ATHENS DISPOSAL COMPANY, INC Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    Plaintiff, a trash truck driver, filed this suit, denominated a class action, against his former employer, a private company. He alleged the employer had violated the Labor Code by, among other things, denying meal and rest periods. The employer responded with a petition to compe…
  20. In re E.S., Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    E.S. appeals from the judgment of the juvenile court sustaining a petition alleging that he comes within the provisions of section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. His court-appointed counsel initially filed a brief raising no legal issues and asking this court to conduc…
Prev1…12131415161718…100Next
Lean category · served in 17 ms · full site view