THE PEOPLE v. POWEREX CORPORATION
<br /> <br /> <p><b>THE PEOPLE</b><strong> v.</strong><b> POWEREX CORPORATION</b></p><br /> <br /> <p align=center></p><br /> <br /> <p align=center>Filed 8/3/07</p><br /> <br /> <p align=center></p><br /> <br /> <p align=center></p><br /> <br /> <p align=center></p><br /> <br /> <p><u>CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</u></p><br /> <br /> <p><b>COPY</b></p><br /> <br /> <p>IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA</p><br /> <br /> <p>THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT</p><br /> <br /> <p>(Sacramento)</p><br /> <br /> <p>----</p><table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0><tr><td width=355 valign=top><br /> <br /> <p>THE PEOPLE ex rel. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., as Attorney General, etc., </p><br /> <br /> <p> Plaintiff and Appellant,</p><br /> <br /> <p><i> v</i>.</p><br /> <br /> <p>POWEREX CORPORATION,</p><br /> <br /> <p> Defendant and Respondent.</p></td><td width=283 valign=top><br /> <br /> <p>C051868</p><br /> <br /> <p>Super. Ct. No. 04AS05129</p><br /> <br /> <p><b><em>Modification of Opinion;</em></b></p><br /> <br /> <p><b><em>No change in judgment</em></b></p><br /> <br /> <p><b></b></p></td></tr></table><br /> <br /> <p>APPEAL from the judgment of the <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">Superior Court of Sacramento County</a>. Loren E. McMaster, Judge. Affirmed.</p><br /> <br /> <p>Bill Lockyer, <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">Attorney</a> General, Thomas J. Greene, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mark Breckler, Danette E. Valdez, Annadel A. Almendras, Myung J. Park, and Song Hill Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Appellant.</p><br /> <br /> <p>Gurnee and Daniels, Steven H. Gurnee, John A. Mason; Bracewell & Giuliani, J. Clifford Gunter, III and Andrew M. Edison, Pro Hac Vice, for Defendant and Respondent.</p><br /> <br /> <p>THE COURT:</p><br /> <br /> <p> It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 11, 2007, <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">modified</a> and certified for publication on July 11, 2007, be further modified in the following manner:</p><br /> <br /> <p> On page 7, in part B of the Background section, insert the following language after the first sentence of the previously modified part:</p><br /> <br /> <p>(<i>Powerex Corp. v. </i><i>California</i><i>, </i>Dkt. No. 05-584.) The United States Supreme Court recently held in related litigation that a statutory bar on appeals from remand orders applied in FSIA cases.</p><br /> <br /> <p>In full text, the <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">modification</a> now reads:</p><br /> <br /> <p>Powerex petitioned for a writ of certiorari on the FSIA claim. (<i>Powerex Corp. v. </i><em>California</em><i>, </i>Dkt. No. 05-584.) The United States Supreme Court recently held in related litigation that a statutory bar on appeals from remand orders applied in FSIA cases. (<i>Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy <a href="http://www.sandiegohealthdirectory.com/">Services</a>, Inc. </i>(2007) --- U.S. --- [127 S.Ct. 2411].) The court then denied Powerexs petition in the federal portion of this case. (<i>Powerex Corp. v. </i><em>California</em><i>, </i>Dkt. No. 05-584, cert. den. June 25, 2007.)</p><br /> <br /> <p>This modification does not change the judgment.</p><br /> <br /> <p>FOR THE COURT:</p><br /> <br /> <p><u> BLEASE </u>, Acting P.J.</p><br /> <br /> <p><u> MORRISON </u>, J.</p><br /> <br /> <p><u> BUTZ </u>, J.</p><br /> <br /> <p>Publication Courtesy of <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">California attorney directory</a>.</p><br /> <br /> <p>Analysis and review provided by <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">Oceanside Property line Lawyers.</a></p>