<p>THE COPLEY PRESS, INC v. SUPERIOR COURT</p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">Filed 8/31/06</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"><b>IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA</b></p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p>THE COPLEY PRESS, INC., )</p> <br /> <p> )</p> <br /> <p> Petitioner, )</p> <br /> <p> ) S128603</p> <br /> <p> v. )</p> <br /> <p> ) Ct.App. 4/1 D042251</p> <br /> <p>THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN )</p> <br /> <p>DIEGO COUNTY, )</p> <br /> <p> ) San Diego County</p> <br /> <p> Respondent; ) Super. Ct. No. GIC807922</p> <br /> <p> )</p> <br /> <p>COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO et al., )</p> <br /> <p> )</p> <br /> <p> Real Parties in Interest. )</p> <br /> <p>_______________________________________ )<u></u></p> <br /> <p><b>Continue from Part I ………</b></p> <br /> <p>To the extent this examination of the statutory language leaves uncertainty, it is appropriate to consider â€