<p>STARK v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER COUNTY</p> <br /> <p>Filed 6/15/06</p> <br /> <p align="center">CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">(Sutter)</p> <br /> <p align="center">----</p><br /> <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><br /> <tr><br /> <td width="394" valign="top"> <br /> <p>ROBERT E. STARK,</p> <br /> <p> Petitioner,</p> <br /> <p> v.</p> <br /> <p>THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER COUNTY,</p> <br /> <p> Respondent;</p> <br /> <p>THE PEOPLE,</p> <br /> <p> Real Party in Interest.</p><br /> </td><br /> <td width="230" valign="top"> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">C051073, C051074</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">(Super. Ct. Nos. CRMS051001, CRMS051031)</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p><br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> <tr><br /> <td width="394" valign="top"> <br /> <p>RONDA G. PUTNAM,</p> <br /> <p> Petitioner,</p> <br /> <p> v.</p> <br /> <p>THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER COUNTY,</p> <br /> <p> Respondent;</p> <br /> <p>THE PEOPLE,</p> <br /> <p> Real Party in Interest.</p><br /> </td><br /> <td width="230" valign="top"> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">C051075</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">(Super. Ct. No. CRMS051030)</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p><br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table> <br /> <p> ORIGINAL <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">PROCEEDINGS in mandate</a>. Ted H. Hansen, Judge. Peremptory writ issued.</p> <br /> <p> Rothschild, Wishek, Chastaine & Sands, M. Bradley Wishek; Marilyn Fisher, for Petitioner Robert E. Stark.</p> <br /> <p> Blackmon & Associates, Clyde M. Blackmon, Melinda J. Nye; Marilyn Fisher, for Petitioner Ronda Putman.</p> <br /> <p><b>Story continue from Part I ………….</b><b></b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p>1. <i><a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">False Entry</a></i><i></i></p> <br /> <p> We begin with the fourth count, which we can resolve on the same basis that we resolved the second count. As noted, Stark contends that â€