SOUTH SUTTER v. LJ SUTTER PARTNERS Part-III
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html > <head> <title>SOUTH SUTTER v</title> </head> <body> <div> <br/><b >SOUTH SUTTER v. LJ SUTTER PARTNERS</b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>Filed 3/16/11 <br/><u> </u> <br/><u> </u> <br/><u> </u> <br/><u> </u> <br/><u>CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</u> <br/><u> </u> <br/><u> </u> <br/><u> </u> <br/>IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br/>THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT <br/>(Sutter) <br/>---- <br/> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 > <tr > <td width=394 valign=top > <br/>SOUTH SUTTER, LLC, <br/> <br/> Plaintiff and Appellant, <br/> <br/> v. <br/> <br/>LJ SUTTER PARTNERS, L.P., et al., <br/> <br/> Defendants and Respondents. <br/> </td> <td width=230 valign=top > <br/>C058206 <br/> <br/>(Super. Ct. No. <br/>CV-CS-07-2068) </td> </tr> <tr > <td width=394 valign=top > <br/> <br/>SOUTH SUTTER, LLC, <br/> <br/> Plaintiff and Appellant, <br/> <br/> v. <br/> <br/>ANDERSON WEST, LLC, <br/> <br/> Defendant and Respondent. <br/> </td> <td width=230 valign=top > <br/> <br/>C059554 <br/> <br/>(Super. Ct. No. <br/>CV-CS-07-2068) <br/> </td> </tr> </table> <br/> <br/> <br/><b >STORY CONTINUE FROM PART II….</b> <br/><b > </b> <br/><b > </b> <br/>A. <i >Standard of review</i> <br/>Subdivision (b)(1) of section 425.16 sets forth the elements of an anti-SLAPP motion. It provides: <a name=clsccl2></a>â€