Ramirez v. Kar — Fear Not Law

<html><head><title>Filed 2/24/06 Ramirez v</title> <style></style> </head> <body> <h5>Ramirez v. Kar</h5> Filed 2/24/06 Ramirez v. Kar CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO <table border=0> <tbody> <tr> <td vAlign=top width=319> GLICERIO D. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MANOJ KAR et al., Defendants and Respondents. </td> <td vAlign=top width=319> E038280 (Super.Ct.No. VCV 034515) OPINION </td></tr></tbody></table> APPEAL from the <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">Superior Court of San Bernardino County</a>. Jules E. Fleuret, Judge. Affirmed. Glicerio D. Ramirez, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Bruce A. Behrens, Chief Counsel, Linda Cohen Harrel, Deputy Chief Counsel, Carol Quan, Assistant Chief Counsel, and Patrick H. Barney, Deputy <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">Attorney</a> for Defendants and Respondents. 1. Introduction Plaintiff Glicerio D. Ramirez appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend defendants' demurrer to Ramirez's complaint for <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">employment discrimination</a> based on <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">hostile work environment</a>, for <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">intentional infliction of emotional distress</a>, and for <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">punitive damages and lost wage</a>s. Our review is hampered because Ramirez, acting <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">in propria persona</a>, has not followed the rules and conventions of appellate procedure: â€