<p><b>PRIEBE v. NELSON</b><b></b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <h2>Filed 8/28/06</h2> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"><b>IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA</b></p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p>MARTA PRIEBE, )</p> <br /> <p> )</p> <br /> <p> Plaintiff and Appellant, )</p> <br /> <p> ) S126412</p> <br /> <p> v. )</p> <br /> <p> ) Ct.App. 1/4 A101630</p> <br /> <p>RUSSELL NELSON, )</p> <br /> <p> ) Humboldt County</p> <br /> <p> Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. DR010121</p> <br /> <p>_______________________________________ )<u></u></p> <br /> <p><b>Continue from Part I ……….</b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p>We have shown that subdivision (a) of section 3342 has been held to impose a <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">duty of care</a> on every dog owner to prevent his or her dog from biting persons in a public place or lawfully in a private place so as â€