legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Pinner Construction v. Los Angeles Unif. School Dist

Pinner Construction v. Los Angeles Unif. School Dist
02:27:2006

Filed 12/7/05 Pinner Construction v. Los Angeles Unif. School Dist. CA2/7


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION SEVEN














PINNER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,


Defendant and Respondent.



B177484


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. BS088227)



BERNARDS BROS. INC.,


Real Party in Interest.




APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Dzintra Janavs, Judge. Affirmed.


Kellam & Biedebach and Newton Winston Kellam; Case, Ibrahim & Clauss and Fouad Albert Ibrahim for Plaintiff and Appellant.


Orbach, Huff & Suarez, David M. Huff and Ryan W. Baldino for Defendant and Respondent.


Ted R. Gropman for Real Party in Interest.


___________________________


INTRODUCTION



Petitioner/appellant, Pinner Construction Company, Inc. (â€





Description A decision regarding writ of mandate.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale