PEOPLE v. YARBROUGH
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html > <head> <title>PEOPLE v</title> </head> <body> <div> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/><b >PEOPLE v. YARBROUGH</b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>Filed 3/23/11 <br/><b > </b> <br/><b > </b> <br/><b > </b> <br/><b >CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br/> <br/>SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT <br/> <br/>DIVISION ONE <br/> <br/> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 > <tr > <td width=319 valign=top > <br/>THE PEOPLE, <br/> <br/> Plaintiff and Respondent, <br/> <br/> v. <br/> <br/>JAMMAL HANEEF YARBROUGH, <br/> <br/> Defendant and Appellant. <br/> </td> <td width=319 valign=top > <br/> B222399 <br/> <br/> (Los Angeles County <br/> Super. Ct. No. PA065170) </td> </tr> </table> <br/> <br/> <br/> APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of <a href="http://www.adrservices.org/neutrals/frederick-mandabach.php">Los Angeles County. </a> Ronald S. Coen, Judge. Reversed. <br/> Linda Charman Hayes, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. <br/> Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Blythe J. Leszkay and David Zarmi, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. <br/> <br/>___________________________________ <br clear=all > <br/>Defendant Jammal Yarbrough appeals from a judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of first degree burglary for having entered a second-floor unenclosed balcony of an apartment with intent to commit a theft. He contends the court erroneously instructed the jury that an unenclosed balcony is part of a building for purposes of the burglary statute and that the facts disclosed only an <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">attempted burglary</a>. We agree because the Supreme Court in <i >People v. Valencia</i> (2002) 28 Cal.4th 1 (<i >Valencia</i>) stated â€