<h6>PEOPLE v. ROGERS</h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6> </h6> <br /> <h6 align="center">Filed 8/21/06</h6> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"><b>IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA</b></p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p>THE PEOPLE, )</p> <br /> <p> )</p> <br /> <p> Plaintiff and Respondent, )</p> <br /> <p> ) S005502</p> <br /> <p> v. )</p> <br /> <p> ) </p> <br /> <p>DAVID KEITH ROGERS, )</p> <br /> <p> ) Kern County</p> <br /> <p> Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. 33477</p> <br /> <p>_______________________________________ )<u></u></p> <br /> <p><b>Continue from Part III ……. </b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p>We disagree. When reviewing <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">ambiguous instructions</a>, we inquire whether the jury was â€