PEOPLE v. RICHARD LACY LETNER and CHRISTOPHER ALLAN TOBIN Part VII
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>Filed 7/29/10</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/><b >PEOPLE v. RICHARD LACY LETNER and</b><br /> <br/><b >CHRISTOPHER ALLAN TOBIN</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/29/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >IN THE SUPREME COURT OF </b><b<br /> >CALIFORNIA</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>THE PEOPLE, )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> Plaintiff<br /> and Respondent, )<br /> <br/> ) S015384<br /> <br/> v. )<br /> <br/> ) <br /> <br/>RICHARD LACY LETNER and )<br /> <br/>CHRISTOPHER<br /> ALLAN TOBIN, )<br /> <br/> ) Tulare<br /> County<br /> <br/> Defendants<br /> and Appellants. ) Super.<br /> Ct. No. 26592<br /> <br/>__________________________________ )<u></u><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b >Story continued from part VI…..</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/>Finally, defendants attack the<br /> propriety of giving the instruction at all. <br /> Letner argues in a conclusory<br /> fashion that the instruction was not â€