PEOPLE v. LOMAX Part-III
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>PEOPLE v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b >PEOPLE v. LOMAX</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/1/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >IN THE SUPREME<br /> COURT OF </b><b >CALIFORNIA</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>THE PEOPLE, )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> Plaintiff<br /> and Respondent, )<br /> <br/> ) S057321<br /> <br/> v. )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/>DARREL LEE LOMAX, )<br /> <br /> <br/> )<br /> Los<br /> Angeles County<br /> <br/> Defendant<br /> and Appellant. ) Super. Ct.<br /> No. NA023819<br /> <br/>__________________________________ )<u></u><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >Story continued from part II…..</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <h2>B. <i>Stun<br /> Belt</i> </h2><br /> <br/> Defendant<br /> argues the court violated his rights under the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and<br /> Fourteenth Amendments, and his corresponding state constitutional rights, by<br /> ordering him to wear an electronic security belt during trial. We conclude this order was an appropriate<br /> exercise of the court's discretion.<br /> <br/> In<br /> general, the â€