PEOPLE v. LOMAX Part-II
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>PEOPLE v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b >PEOPLE v. LOMAX</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/1/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >IN THE SUPREME<br /> COURT OF </b><b >CALIFORNIA</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>THE PEOPLE, )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> Plaintiff<br /> and Respondent, )<br /> <br/> ) S057321<br /> <br/> v. )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/>DARREL LEE LOMAX, )<br /> <br /> <br/> )<br /> Los<br /> Angeles County<br /> <br/> Defendant<br /> and Appellant. ) Super. Ct.<br /> No. NA023819<br /> <br/>__________________________________ )<u></u><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >Story continued from part I…..</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>On August 28, 1995, Deputy Public Defender Isaacson asked for<br /> the addresses of all witnesses, including penalty phase witnesses in Oregon. These addresses had been redacted from the<br /> police reports given to the defense. The<br /> prosecutor responded that the civilian witnesses were reluctant to be contacted<br /> because they were â€