PEOPLE v. JENNINGS Part-V
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>PEOPLE v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >PEOPLE v. </b><b<br /> >JENNINGS</b><b<br /> ></b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 8/12/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >IN THE SUPREME COURT OF </b><b<br /> >CALIFORNIA</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>THE PEOPLE, )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> Plaintiff and Respondent, )<br /> <br/> ) S081148<br /> <br/> v. )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/>MARTIN CARL JENNINGS, )<br /> <br/> ) San Bernardino County<br /> <br/> Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. FVI-04195<br /> <br/>__________________________________ )<u></u><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b >Story continued from part IV…..</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/>Defendant alternatively contends that the<br /> trial court should have amplified its concurrent causation instruction by<br /> defining â€