<p><b>PEOPLE </b><b>v. </b><b>JEFFERY</b><b></b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b>Filed 9/21/06</b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b>CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center">IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">DIVISION SIX</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p><br /> <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><br /> <tr><br /> <td width="319" valign="top"> <br /> <p>THE PEOPLE,</p> <br /> <p> Plaintiff and Respondent,</p> <br /> <p>v.</p> <br /> <p>TINA LOUISE JEFFERY,</p> <br /> <p> Defendant and Appellant.</p><br /> </td><br /> <td width="319" valign="top"> <br /> <p align="center">2d Crim. No. B187352</p> <br /> <p align="center">(Super. Ct. No. F367711)</p> <br /> <p align="center">(San Luis Obispo County) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION</p> <br /> <p align="center">[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p><br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table> <br /> <p>THE COURT:</p> <br /> <p> It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 22, 2006, be <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">modified</a> as follows:</p> <br /> <p> Page 5, first and second paragraphs are deleted and the following paragraphs inserted:</p> <br /> <p> In many cases the appellate court enters the mind of the trial judge and affirms a ruling because of "<a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">implied findings</a>." There are also cases in which an appellate court takes a flight of fancy to conclude that there is no <a href="http://www.sandiegohealthdirectory.com/">possibility of a different decision</a>. This is not such a case. Here there is evidence of excessive criminality. There is also evidence that the defendant is an addict who may profit by a <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">California Rehabilitation Center</a> commitment. </p> <br /> <p> We remand so that the court may either initiate CRC commitment </p> <br /> <p>proceedings or specify its reasons for not doing so. We take no position on how the trial court should rule. </p> <br /> <p> The <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">judgment is reversed</a> and remanded. </p> <br /> <p> [There is no change in the judgment.]</p> <br /> <p>Publication courtesy of <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">San Diego pro bono legal advice</a>.</p> <br /> <p>Analysis and review provided by <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">Poway Property line Lawyers.</a></p>