<p><b>PEOPLE v. BRADLEY</b><b></b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <h1>Filed 8/24/06</h1> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b>CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</b><b></b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"><b> </b></p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center">DIVISION EIGHT</p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p><br /> <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><br /> <tr><br /> <td width="319" valign="top"> <br /> <p>THE PEOPLE,</p> <br /> <p> Plaintiff and Respondent,</p> <br /> <p> v.</p> <br /> <p>OMAR BRADLEY et al.,</p> <br /> <p> Defendants and Appellants.</p><br /> </td><br /> <td width="319" valign="top"> <br /> <p> B175564</p> <br /> <p> (Los Angeles County</p> <br /> <p> Super. Ct. No. BA 240392)</p><br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table> <br /> <p><b>Continue from Part I …….</b></p> <br /> <p><b> </b></p> <br /> <p>Bradley also argues that retention of unspent funds cannot become â€