PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER Part-VI
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>PEOPLE<br /> v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b<br /> >PEOPLE v</b><b >. ALEXANDER</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/15/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >IN THE SUPREME<br /> COURT OF </b><b >CALIFORNIA</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>THE PEOPLE, )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> Plaintiff<br /> and Respondent, )<br /> <br/> ) S053228<br /> <br/> v. )<br /> <br/> ) <br /> <br/>ANDRE STEPHEN ALEXANDER, )<br /> <br/> ) Los<br /> Angeles County<br /> <br/> Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. BA065313-01<br /> <br/>__________________________________ )<u></u><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >Story continued from part V…..</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <h3>7. Exclusion<br /> of Testimony of Jacqueline Sherow</h3><br /> <br/> Defendant contends the trial court<br /> abused its discretion by excluding the testimony of Jacqueline Sherow (see <i >People v.<br /> Lawley</i> (2002) 27 Cal.4th 102, 153), and thereby<br /> violated his federal due process rights.<br /> <br/> It appears that, in a report of his<br /> 1992 interview with Sherow, Detective Henry stated<br /> that she told him she had a conversation with Charles Brock some time after the<br /> Cross murder in which Charles said, â€