PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER Part-V
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>PEOPLE<br /> v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >PEOPLE <br /> v. ALEXANDER</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/15/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >IN THE SUPREME<br /> COURT OF </b><b >CALIFORNIA</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>THE PEOPLE, )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> Plaintiff<br /> and Respondent, )<br /> <br/> ) S053228<br /> <br/> v. )<br /> <br/> ) <br /> <br/>ANDRE STEPHEN ALEXANDER, )<br /> <br/> ) Los<br /> Angeles County<br /> <br/> Defendant<br /> and Appellant. ) Super. Ct.<br /> No. BA065313-01<br /> <br/>__________________________________ )<u></u><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >Story continued from part IV…..</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <h3>2. Admission<br /> of Blood Tests Conducted on the Jacket</h3><br /> <br/> Defendant contends the testimony<br /> regarding the presumptive blood tests conducted on the seized jacket should not<br /> have been admitted because the evidence was irrelevant and unduly prejudicial<br /> under sections 350 and 352 of the Evidence Code, respectively, and because its<br /> admission violated his federal constitutional right to a reliable determination<br /> of guilt.<br /> <br/> Relevant evidence is evidence<br /> â€