PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER Part-II
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>PEOPLE<br /> v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >PEOPLE <br /> v. ALEXANDER</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/15/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >IN THE SUPREME<br /> COURT OF </b><b >CALIFORNIA</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>THE PEOPLE, )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> Plaintiff<br /> and Respondent, )<br /> <br/> ) S053228<br /> <br/> v. )<br /> <br/> ) <br /> <br/>ANDRE STEPHEN ALEXANDER, )<br /> <br/> ) Los<br /> Angeles County<br /> <br/> Defendant<br /> and Appellant. ) Super. Ct.<br /> No. BA065313-01<br /> <br/>__________________________________ )<u></u><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >Story continued from part I…..</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Defendant was bound over to superior court<br /> and, on August 2, 1993,<br /> he was arraigned before Judge Ito. Kopple appeared with defendant but did not mention that she<br /> had been <i >appointed</i> as counsel in<br /> municipal court. Judge Ito assigned the<br /> matter to Judge Horan for trial. Later<br /> that morning, when Judge Horan questioned her status as appointed counsel, Kopple said she had been appointed in municipal court and<br /> assumed her appointment would continue. <br /> Judge Horan returned the matter to Judge Ito to clarify Kopple's status because she was â€