legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Tanner

P. v. Tanner
10:20:2010



P


















P. v. Tanner













Filed 10/18/10 P. v.
Tanner CA3







NOT
TO BE PUBLISHED




California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF
APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE
DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----




>






THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



BRANDON TANNER,



Defendant and Appellant.




C063987



(Super.
Ct. No. 09F00130)










After a jury found
defendant Brandon Tanner guilty of first
degree burglary, he was placed on five years' formal probation with various
terms and conditions.

On appeal,
defendant challenges two of those conditions.
Both contentions are conceded by the People, and we agree that both have
merit.

First, although
the trial court ordered defendant â€




Description After a jury found defendant Brandon Tanner guilty of first degree burglary, he was placed on five years' formal probation with various terms and conditions.
On appeal, defendant challenges two of those conditions. Both contentions are conceded by the People, and we agree that both have merit.
First, although the trial court ordered defendant â€
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale