P v. BOYER ( Part V )
<h1 align="left">P v. BOYER</h1> <br /> <h1 align="left"> </h1> <br /> <h1 align="left"> </h1> <br /> <h1 align="left"> </h1> <br /> <h1> </h1> <br /> <h1>Filed 5/11/06</h1> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"><b>IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA</b></p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p align="center"> </p> <br /> <p>THE PEOPLE, )</p> <br /> <p> )</p> <br /> <p> <a name="LD"></a>Plaintiff and Respondent, )</p> <br /> <p> ) S<a name="casenum"></a>029476</p> <br /> <p> v. )</p> <br /> <p> ) <a name="appealnum"></a> </p> <br /> <p><a name="defendant"></a>RICHARD DELMER BOYER, )</p> <br /> <p> ) <a name="county"></a>Orange County</p> <br /> <p> <a name="VD"></a>Defendant and Appellant. ) <a name="supernum"></a>Super. Ct. No. C-51866</p> <br /> <p>___________ )<u></u></p> <br /> <p><b>Story Continued from Part IV ………</b></p> <br /> <p>examination, ruling that while the prosecution could not use defendant's statement <i>to the police</i> to impeach a defense witness, statements voluntarily made by defendant to defense experts could be used to cross-examine Dr. Klatte as to the basis for his expert opinion.<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup>[1]</sup></a></p> <br /> <p>On direct examination, Dr. Klatte testified, among other things, that in 1990, appellant said he was â€