P. v. Akselsen — Fear Not Law

<h2>P. v. Akselsen</h2> Filed 8/17/06 P. v. Akselsen CA6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="319" valign="top"> THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. IAN FOREST AKSELSEN, Defendant and Appellant. </td> <td width="319" valign="top"> H028973 (Santa Cruz County Super. Ct. No. F06729) </td> </tr> </table> In the court below, defendant Ian Forest Akselsen unsuccessfully moved to quash a <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">search warrant</a> and <a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/">suppress evidence</a>. Thereafter, he pleaded guilty to possession of <a href="http://www.sandiegohealthdirectory.com/">marijuana for sale</a>. On appeal, he contends that the affidavit in support of a warrant to search his person, home, and car was unattested or, alternatively, insufficient to furnish <a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">probable cause. </a> We disagree and affirm the judgment. <h1>background</h1> Santa Cruz County Narcotics Enforcement Team agents and University of California Santa Cruz police executed search warrants after a five-month investigation of students selling <a href="http://www.sandiegohealthdirectory.com/">narcotics. </a> They arrested four suspects, one of whom was Grant Goodrich. Goodrich confessed and offered to provide information about his supplier in exchange for â€