MORRISON v. CREEK Part-I
<html > <head> <title>MORRISON v</title> </head> <body> <div> <br/><b >MORRISON</b> v.<b > CREEK</b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>Filed 3/29/11 <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/><b >CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</b> <br/> <br/> <br/>IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br/> <br/>FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT <br/> <br/>DIVISION FIVE <br/> <br/> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 > <tr > <td width=319 valign=top > <br/><b >SARAH MORRISON,</b> <br/><b > Plaintiff and Appellant,</b> <br/><b >v.</b> <br/><b >VINEYARD CREEK et al.,</b> <br/><b > Defendants and Respondents.</b> </td> <td width=319 valign=top > <br/><b > </b> <br/><b > </b> <br/><b > A127476</b> <br/><b > </b> <br/><b > (</b><b >Sonoma</b><b > </b><b >County</b><b ></b> <br/><b > Super. </b><b >Ct.</b><b > No. SCV-240627)</b> <br/><b > </b> </td> </tr> </table> <br/> <br/> Sarah Morrison appeals from a post-judgment order denying her motion for attorney's fees under Civil Code section 1942.5 and Government Code section 12989.2 after the parties had resolved their dispute by settlement. We will affirm the order. <br/> I. <u>FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY</u> <br/> On January 8, 2007, Morrison signed a lease and moved into an apartment at Vineyard Creek Apartments in Santa Rosa, <a href="http://www.adrservices.org/neutrals/frederick-mandabach.php">California</a>. The lease agreement provided on the first page, which Morrison initialed, that the apartment would â€