Melchor v. Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>Melchor v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >Melchor v. </b><b<br /> >Fresno</b><b<br /> > </b><b<br /> >Community</b><b<br /> > </b><b<br /> >Hospital</b><b<br /> > and </b><b<br /> >Medical</b><b<br /> > </b><b<br /> >Center</b><b<br /> ></b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/30/10 Melchor v. Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center CA1/5<br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/><b<br /> >NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS</b><br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>California<br /> Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or<br /> relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except<br /> as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This<br /> opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes<br /> of rule 8.1115<b >.</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>IN<br /> THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>FIRST<br /> APPELLATE DISTRICT<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>DIVISION<br /> FIVE<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0<br /> ><br /> <tr ><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/><b<br /> >JOSE MELCHOR et al.,</b><br /> <br/><b<br /> > Plaintiffs<br /> and Appellants,</b><br /> <br/><b<br /> >v.</b><br /> <br/><b<br /> >FRESNO</b><b<br /> > </b><b >COMMUNITY</b><b ><br /> </b><b >HOSPITAL</b><b<br /> > AND </b><b<br /> >MEDICAL</b><b<br /> > </b><b >CENTER</b><b >,</b><br /> <br/><b<br /> > Defendant<br /> and Respondent.</b><br /> </td><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > A124445</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > (</b><b<br /> >Alameda</b><b<br /> > </b><b >County</b><b ></b><br /> <br/><b > Super. </b><b<br /> >Ct.</b><b<br /> > No. RG06302527)</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Jose<br /> Melchor and Natalie Melchor, by and through their guardians ad litem, Martin<br /> Melchor and Ramona Melchor, appeal from a judgment entered after the court<br /> granted the summary judgment motion<br /> of respondent Fresno Community<br /> Hospital and Medical<br /> Center (Fresno Community). Appellants contend that the court erred in<br /> overruling their objections to the evidence submitted by Fresno Community, and<br /> a triable issue of material fact precluded the grant of summary judgment. We will affirm the judgment.<br /> <br/>I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY<br /> <br/> In<br /> December 2006, Jose and Natalie Melchor, through their guardians ad litem,<br /> filed a complaint alleging professional<br /> negligence on the part of numerous defendants including Fresno Community<br /> (erroneously sued as â€