L.A. CHECKER CAB COOPERATIVE, INC.,v. FIRST SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>L</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >L.A. CHECKER CAB COOPERATIVE, INC.,v. FIRST SPECIALTY<br /> INSURANCE COMPANY</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 6/14/10;<br /> pub. order 7/13/10<br /> (see end of opn.)<br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>DIVISION ONE<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 width=672<br /> ><br /> <tr ><br /> <td width=336 valign=top ><br /> <br/>L.A. CHECKER CAB COOPERATIVE, INC.,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Cross-Complainant<br /> and Appellant,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> v.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>FIRST SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Cross-Defendant<br /> and Respondent.<br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> <td width=336 valign=top ><br /> <br/> B213948<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> (Los<br /> Angeles County<br /> <br/> Super. Ct.<br /> No. BC359867)<br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior<br /> Court of Los Angeles<br /> County. <br /> Rex Heeseman, Judge. <br /> Affirmed.<br /> <br/>________<br /> <br/> Law Offices of Neil C. Evans and<br /> Neil C. Evan for Cross-complainant and Appellant.<br /> <br/> Cresswell, Echeguren, Rodgers<br /> & Noble, Ronald D. Echeguren, Elsa S. Baldwin and Matthew S. Harvey for<br /> Cross-defendant and Respondent.<br /> <br/>________<br /> <br/> We hold that the employer in this case is not covered for<br /> an assault and battery by its employee<br /> under the â€