Kyles v. Great Oaks Interests
Filed 2/16/07 Kyles v. Great Oaks Interests CA6
NOT TO BEPUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
CaliforniaRules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing orrelying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, exceptas specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified forpublication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
INTHE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTHAPPELLATE DISTRICT
| KIMBERLY KYLES et al.,
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
GREAT OAKS INTERESTS et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
| H028774 (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CV803869)
|
Appellants Kimberly Kyles (Kyles), individuallyand as guardian ad litem of her minor son, Kaelin Adams-Kyles (Kaelin), andKaelin's father, Ezell Adams (Adams; hereafter collectively Plaintiffs), suedrespondents Great Oaks Properties (Great Oaks), Ventana Property Services, Inc.(Ventana), and others for personal injuries and other injuries. Plaintiffslived in a single-family home adjacent to the Comstock Apartments (Apartments)in Mountain View. Great Oaks owned the Apartments and Ventana managed theapartment complex. Plaintiffs allege Great Oaks and Ventana negligently managedthe garbage areas of the Apartments and that their negligence caused a clowderof cats to gather and feed on the garbage. After feasting on what Plaintiffs'expert described as an â€