KHAN v. LOS ANGELES CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Part-II
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>KHAN v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/><b<br /> >KHAN v. LOS<br /> ANGELES CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 8/3/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b<br /> >CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>IN<br /> THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>SECOND<br /> APPELLATE DISTRICT<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>DIVISION<br /> ONE<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0<br /> ><br /> <tr ><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/>ABRAHAM<br /> KHAN,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Plaintiff and Respondent,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> v.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>LOS<br /> ANGELES CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Defendant and Appellant.<br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/> B214685<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> (Los Angeles County<br /> <br/> Super. Ct. No. BS108965)<br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >STORY CONTINUE FROM <br /> PART I….</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b >B. There is No Reciprocity Between LACERS and JRS/JRS II.</b><br /> <br/> <i<br /> > 1. AB 1099 Did Not Create â€