JSM TUSCANY v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY Part-II
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html > <head> <title>JSM TUSCANY v</title> </head> <body> <div> <br/> <br/><b >JSM </b><b >TUSCANY</b><b > v. </b><b >SUPERIOR</b><b > </b><b >COURT</b><b > </b><b >OF</b><b > </b><b >LOS ANGELES</b><b > </b><b >COUNTY</b><b ></b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>Filed 3/29/11 <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/><b ><i >CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</i></b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br/> <br/>SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT <br/> <br/>DIVISION THREE <br/> <br/> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 > <tr > <td width=319 valign=top > <br/>JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., <br/> <br/> Petitioners, <br/> <br/> v. <br/> <br/>THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, <br/> <br/> Respondents; <br/> <br/>NMS PROPERTIES, INC., et al., <br/> <br/> Real Parties in Interest. <br/> </td> <td width=319 valign=top > <br/> B227360 <br/> <br/> (Los Angeles County <br/> Super. Ct. No. BC432260) <br/> </td> </tr> </table> <br/> <br/> <br/><b >STORY CONTINUE FROM PART I….</b> <br/> <br/> <br/>2. <i >Review By Writ Is Appropriate</i> <br/> In <i >Powers v. City of Richmond</i> (1995) 10 Cal.4th 85, 113, our Supreme Court stated, â€