In re Travon H.
Filed 2/22/08 In re Travon H. CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
In re TRAVON H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B200825 |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TRAVON H., Defendant and Appellant. | (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MJ15742) |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard Naranjo, Judge. Affirmed.
Nicole Williams, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Travon H. appeals from an order of wardship pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 upon a finding that he committed a second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211).[1] He was ordered home on probation.
The evidence at the adjudication hearing established that on April 13, 2007, C. and his brother were sitting on their bikes in front of Quartz Hill Elementary School in Los Angeles County when appellant and his companion M. approached. M. said his feet hurt and told C. to give him the bike. M. said, If you give me the bike[,] no one gets hurt. Appellant stood behind M. and also told C. to give M. the bike. When C. said he had to get home, M. said he too had to get home and yanked the bike out of C.s hands. M. got on the bike and rode away, and appellant walked away in the same direction. C. was frightened when M. demanded the bike, and when appellant approached and demanded that C. turn over the bike, that frightened C. even more.
C.s brother rode home to tell their parents what had happened. Their father picked up C. in a van and they drove around looking for the bike. At some point, they found appellant and C.s father grabbed him by the shirt. Appellant punched C.s dad in the neck. C. and his father, thereafter, found M. and recovered the bike.
After review of the record, appellants court-appointed counsel filed an opening brief requesting this court to independently review the record pursuant to the holding of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.
On November 6, 2007, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that no arguable issues exist and that appellant has, by virtue of counsels compliance with the Wende procedure and our review of the record, received adequate and effective appellate review of the order entered against him in this case. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 112-113.)
DISPOSITION
The order is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
MANELLA, J.
We concur:
WILLHITE, Acting P.J.
SUZUKAWA, J.
Publication Courtesy of California lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Escondido Property line attorney.
[1] The offense of battery alleged in paragraph 2 was dismissed for insufficient proof.
