In re the Marriage of BARBARA and WILLIAM C. SCHOPFER
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>In re the Marriage of BARBARA and WILLIAM C</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/><b >In re the Marriage of BARBARA and<br /> WILLIAM C. SCHOPFER</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/7/10; opinion on rehearing<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><u>CERTIFIED<br /> FOR PUBLICATION</u><br /> <br/><u> </u><br /> <br/><u> </u><br /> <br/>IN THE COURT OF<br /> APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA<br /> <br/>THIRD APPELLATE<br /> DISTRICT<br /> <br/>(Sacramento)<br /> <br/>----<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0<br /> ><br /> <tr ><br /> <td width=343 valign=top ><br /> <br/>In re the Marriage of BARBARA<br /> and WILLIAM C. SCHOPFER.<br /> </td><br /> <td width=281 valign=top ><br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> <tr ><br /> <td width=343 valign=top ><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>WILLIAM C. SCHOPFER,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Appellant,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> v.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>DANIEL BONEBRAKE,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Respondent.<br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> <td width=281 valign=top ><br /> <br/>C060549<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>(Super.<br /> Ct. No. 96FL01642)<br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> APPEAL<br /> from a judgment of the Superior Court<br /> of Sacramento<br /> County, Jerilyn L. Borack, Judge. Affirmed.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Frank<br /> E. Dougherty and Matthew K. Purcell for Appellant.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Law Office of Derraugh Manion<br /> Dawson and Law Office of Kimball J.P. Sargeant and Kimball Sargeant for<br /> Respondent.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Following the<br /> death of his ex-wife, William C. Schopfer (father) shared custody of his<br /> daughter, Jennifer, with her stepfather, Daniel C. Bonebrake (stepfather). Pursuant to a court order, father also paid<br /> stepfather $900 each month in child support. <br /> Four months before Jennifer was expected to graduate from high school,<br /> however, and a month before she was to turn 18, father moved to reduce his<br /> child support obligation to zero. The trial court denied his motion.<br /> <br/> On appeal, father<br /> contends the trial court erred in denying his request to modify support because<br /> under subdivision (a) of Family Code section 3951[1]<br /> and <i >Plumas County Dept. of Child Support<br /> Services v. Rodriquez </i>(2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 1021 (<i >Rodriquez</i>), â€