In re MICHAEL B. PRATHER Part-II
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>In re MICHAEL B</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/><b >In re MICHAEL B. PRATHER</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/29/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >IN THE SUPREME COURT OF </b><b<br /> >CALIFORNIA</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> ) S172903<br /> <br/>In re MICHAEL B. PRATHER )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> ) Ct.App. 2/5 B211805<br /> <br/>on Habeas Corpus. ) Los Angeles County<br /> <br/> ) Super.<br /> Ct. No. BH005392<br /> <br/>__________________________________ ) <br /> <br/> ) S173260<br /> <br/>In re MIGUEL MOLINA )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> ) Ct.App. 2/6 B208705<br /> <br/>on Habeas Corpus. ) San Luis Obispo County<br /> <br/> ) Super.<br /> Ct. No. CR13298<br /> <br/>__________________________________ ) <br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b >STORY CONTINUE FROM <br /> PART I….</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/>In<i > In<br /> re Bowers, supra</i>, 40 Cal.App.3d 359, the trial court granted the petition<br /> for a writ of habeas corpus on the basis that the petitioner had not been<br /> afforded a parole prerevocation hearing by the Adult<br /> Authority, the statutory predecessor of the Board. The sole issue before the appellate court was<br /> whether â€