In re MICHAEL B. PRATHER Part-I
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>_</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/><b >In re MICHAEL B. PRATHER</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/29/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >IN THE SUPREME COURT OF </b><b<br /> >CALIFORNIA</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> ) S172903<br /> <br/>In re MICHAEL B. PRATHER )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> ) Ct.App. 2/5 B211805<br /> <br/>on Habeas Corpus. ) Los Angeles County<br /> <br/> ) Super. Ct. No. BH005392<br /> <br/>__________________________________ ) <br /> <br/> ) S173260<br /> <br/>In re MIGUEL MOLINA )<br /> <br/> )<br /> <br/> ) Ct.App. 2/6 B208705<br /> <br/>on Habeas Corpus. ) San Luis Obispo County<br /> <br/> ) Super. Ct. No. CR13298<br /> <br/>__________________________________ ) <br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/>We<br /> granted review in these two cases to determine the proper scope of an order<br /> directed to the Board of Parole Hearings (the Board) when a reviewing court<br /> concludes that a decision to deny parole by the Board is not supported by â€