In re Marriage of MARCI and GARY FONG Part-II
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html > <head> <title>In re Marriage of MARCI and GARY FONG</title> </head> <body> <div> <br/><b >In re Marriage of MARCI and GARY FONG</b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>Filed 3/3/11 <br/><b ><i > </i></b> <br/><b ><i > </i></b> <br/><b ><i > </i></b> <br/><b ><i >CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</i></b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br/> <br/>SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT <br/> <br/>DIVISION THREE <br/> <br/> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 > <tr > <td width=319 valign=top > <br/>In re Marriage of MARCI and GARY FONG. </td> <td width=319 valign=top > <br/> B217038 <br/> <br/> (Los Angeles County </td> </tr> <tr > <td width=319 valign=top > <br/>MARCI KINGTON, <br/> <br/> Respondent, <br/> <br/> v. <br/> <br/>GARY FONG, <br/> <br/> Appellant. <br/> </td> <td width=319 valign=top > <br/> Super. Ct. No. YD042895) </td> </tr> </table> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/><b >STORY CONTINUE FROM PART I….</b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>Accordingly, construing section 2107, subdivision (c) in the context of the statute as a whole, we conclude that only a â€