Fear Not Law CA Pub. Decisions

In re MARK COLLIN SODERSTEN PART II

Filed 2/22/07 In re MARK COLLIN SODERSTEN PART II
CA Pub. Decisions
In re MARK COLLIN SODERSTEN


 


In re MARK COLLIN SODERSTEN


Filed 1/17/07


 


 


 


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT







In re MARK COLLIN SODERSTEN


On Habeas Corpus.



F047425


 


OPINION


STORY CONTINUED FROM PART I……….


 


 


B.        The Undisclosed Tape Recordings


            As previously described, during the course of his investigation in conjunction with the writ proceedings, petitioner's counsel came into possession of tape-recorded interviews of Nicole Wilson, conducted on March 3, 1986, and April 7, 1986; a tape-recorded interview of Lester Williams, conducted on December 1, 1984; and a conversation between Williams and petitioner that was surreptitiously recorded on December 14, 1984.[1]


·              March 3, 1986, interview of Nicole Wilson


            The first portion of this interview was conducted by Phillip Cline, the trial prosecutor.  The second portion was conducted by his investigator, John Johnson.  Throughout the interview, Nicole's tone was often playful, with a singsong quality to it.  Sometimes she sounded reluctant; other times, bored, even when discussing the death of her mother.  Occasionally, she sounded sad.


            The interview began with Cline telling Nicole that he wanted her to pretend like they were in court.  When he asked her last name, she responded, â€

← Back to CA Pub. Decisions · Knowledge Base
Lean view · served in 1 ms · full site view