In re G.G.
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>In re G</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/><b >In re G.G.</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 7/15/10<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b<br /> >CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>IN<br /> THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>SECOND<br /> APPELLATE DISTRICT<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>DIVISION<br /> FIVE<br /> <br/> <br /> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0<br /> ><br /> <tr ><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/>In re G.G. et al., Persons<br /> Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.<br /> </td><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/> B215471<br /> <br/> (Los Angeles<br /> County<br /> <br/> Super. Ct.<br /> No. CK76059)<br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> <tr ><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT<br /> OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Plaintiff and Respondent,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> v.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>F.G.,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Defendant and Appellant.<br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/><b > ORDER MODIFIYING </b><br /> <br/><b > CONCURRING AND DISSENTING<br /> </b><br /> <br/><b > OPINION</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]</b><br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>THE COURT:<br /> <br/> It is<br /> ordered that the concurring and dissenting opinion of Justice Armstrong filed<br /> June 29, 2010, be modified as<br /> follows:<br /> <br/> The first<br /> full paragraph, page 1, last sentence, the words "was within the juvenile<br /> court's discretion" are deleted. <br /> The sentence will now read as follows:<br /> <br/>"I also believe that the trial<br /> court abused its discretion when it ordered that Father undergo counseling for<br /> his racist and sexist remarks, an order which was an outgrowth of the<br /> "chaotic home environment" order."<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>There is no change in judgment.<br /> <br/><b<br /> >CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> ARMSTRONG,<br /> J.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Publication Courtesy of California<br /> free legal resources.<br /> <br/>Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Property line attorney.<br /> <br/>San Diego Case<br /> Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> </div><br /> </body><br /> </html><br />