HOLMES v. PETROVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, Part-II
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html > <head> <title>HOLMES v</title> </head> <body> <div> <br/><b >HOLMES v. PETROVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC,</b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>Filed 1/13/11 <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/><u>CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION</u> <br/><u> </u> <br/><u> </u> <br/><u> </u> <br/>IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br/>THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT <br/>(Sacramento) <br/>---- <br/> <br/> <br/> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 > <tr > <td width=394 valign=top > <br/>GINA M. HOLMES, <br/> <br/> Plaintiff and Appellant, <br/> <br/> v. <br/> <br/>PETROVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, et al., <br/> <br/> Defendants and Respondents. <br/> </td> <td width=230 valign=top > <br/>C059133 <br/> <br/>(Super. Ct. No. 05AS04356) <br/> <br/> </td> </tr> </table> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/><b >STORY CONTINUE FROM PART I….</b> <br/> <br/>B <br/> Next, Holmes contends the court erred in granting the motion for summary adjudication on her cause of action for constructive discharge. According to Holmes, she â€