FERWERDA v. BORDON Part-II
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html > <head> <title>FERWERDA v</title> </head> <body> <div> <br/> <br/><b >FERWERDA v. BORDON</b> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>Filed 3/25/11 <br/><u> </u> <br/><u> </u> <br/><u> </u> <br/><u> </u> <br/><u>CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION</u><a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1" title=""><sup>*</sup></a><sup></sup> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/>IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br/>THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT <br/>(Placer) <br/>---- <br/> <br/> <br/> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 > <tr > <td width=394 valign=top > <br/>ROBERT FERWERDA, <br/> <br/> Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, <br/> <br/> v. <br/> <br/>DAVID BORDON et al., <br/> <br/> Defendants, Cross-defendants and Respondents; <br/> <br/>JAMES WARE et al., <br/> <br/> Cross-complainants, Cross-defendants and Respondents. </td> <td width=230 valign=top > <br/>C062389 <br/> <br/>(Super. Ct. Nos. SCV19417, TCV949, TCV1156) </td> </tr> </table> <br/> <br/><b >STORY CONTINUE FROM PART I….</b> <br/> <br/> <br/>III <br/><i >The Trial Court Applied The Correct Legal Standard In Finding The Denial Of Ferwerda's Building Plan In 2001 Was Proper</i> <br/> Ferwerda contends the trial court applied the wrong legal standard when it determined the committee did not act unreasonably or arbitrarily in denying his building plans in 2001. According to Ferwerda, the applicable legal standard was â€